Drawing for Serial No. 85690391

USPTO serial 85690391

Serial No. 85690391

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SERVANCE, RENEE L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85690391?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori S. Meddings

LORI S MEDDINGS MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVESTE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Foam coasters; insulating sleeve holders for beverage cans and bottles; Foam storage basketsACTIVE—
025Headwear; hats; Ties; Ear muffs; BeltsACTIVE—
028Christmas tree ornaments; flying discs; toy bricks; Balls for sports; footballsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 29, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 11, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 27, 2015RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Jun 18, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 4, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2015GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2015GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Feb 11, 2015CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Oct 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 3, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 3, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance