Drawing for DREW

USPTO serial 85690689

DREW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor K. Sapphire

VICTOR K SAPPHIRE MICHELMAN ROBINSON LLP15760 VENTURA BLVD5TH FLOORENCINO, CA 91436

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; Trinkets, namely, key chains and key fobs as jewelryACTIVE—
025Clothing and wearing apparel not including footwear; jewelry; trinkets, namely, key chains and key fobs as jewelryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 3, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 18, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 20, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 20, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 20, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 23, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance