Drawing for PHOTOGRO

USPTO serial 85692806

PHOTOGRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOTOGRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jen-Feng Lee

JEN-FENG LEE LAW OFFICES OF JF LEE17800 CASTLETON STREETSUITE 560CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91748

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Fertilizers for agricultural useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 31, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 19, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 8, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 9, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 9, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Sep 12, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 9, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 4, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 30, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 30, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 2, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2012TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Sep 25, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance