USPTO serial 85694457
QUERCUS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4478734Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 4, 2014
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUERCUS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
REUS (TARRAGONA), ES
REUS (TARRAGONA), ES
REUS (TARRAGONA), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P. LAPOLLA OSTROLENK FABER LLP845 Third Avenue8th FloorNew York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automatic number plate recognition system for use in traffic and parking lot surveillance, and traffic control systems, namely, cameras, mounting devices and weather resistant housings for cameras, computer software for vehicle license plate recognition, vehicle logging, image processing and image storage; vehicle license plate recognition system comprising video cameras and electrical controllers; computer software for vehicle license plate recognition; cameras for recording images; instruments for monitoring traffic, namely, computers and cameras; traffic infringement detection and processing systems, namely, red light enforcement cameras, access enforcement cameras for parking lot and security control; electronic traffic sensors for use with traffic control systems, and self-contained, user configurable traffic sensors, all the foregoing sensors are positionable to sense and measure speed, occupancy, volume, and presence of multiple traffic lanes from a remote location | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUERCUS TECHNOLOGIES, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by QUERCUS TECHNOLOGIES, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by QUERCUS TECHNOLOGIES, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QUERCUS TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 14, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |