USPTO serial 85695861
THINKING NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINKING NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey
ROGER P. FUREY KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Routers for use by telecommunication and broadband service providers, namely, diameter signaling routers, integrated monitoring Short Message Service (SMS) routers, voicemail routers, Home Location Register (HLR) routers, and Session Initiated Protocol (SIP) routers; telecommunications test equipment; network and communication equipment for conformance, performance, diagnostic testing, analysis, and simulation; network and data management tools; switching equipment used with telecommunications, data, and broadband communication networks; computer software used to collect and export data in the communications, telecommunications, and broadband communications fields; computer software for analyzing statistics, data, and trends; computer software for analyzing and reporting on network functions, namely, roaming, Message Signaling Unit (MSU) accounting, and mobile data bandwidth | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting, management services, information services, and advisory services for communications, telecommunications, and broadband communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consulting, design, and support services in the fields of communications, telecommunications, and broadband communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |