USPTO serial 85697359
HUTCHISON 3G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUTCHISON 3G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in telecommunications, namely, creating, editing, processing, logging, storing, transmission, display, reception, input, output and printing of non-pictorial and graphical data; computer software for database searching, managing communications and data exchange between computers, electronic document storage, manipulation, transfer and retrieval; computers; handheld computers; telecommunications apparatus, namely, telephones, facsimile machines and modems to enable connection to databases and the Internet; printers; optical disc players and computer programs therefor; televisions; monitors; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services, namely, commercial or industrial management assistance; business services, namely, facilities management of technical and operation of ports; providing business information for others, namely, providing information regarding management, demographics, marketing, advertising and personnel data; conducting marketing studies; business planning, business appraisal; data processing services; conducting marketing and business research for others, namely, compilation of business statistics and commercial information, and assistance in the selection of retail store goods and services, namely, an ordering service which matches a buyer's requirement with the buyers' wants and needs all provided via the Internet, terrestrial and satellite television, telephones or other means of communication; retail store services, retail outlet services, computerized on-line retail store services and retail distributorship services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; and mediation of trade business for third parties | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic and telecommunications transmission services, namely, transmission of data, messages, images, sounds, voices, text, audio, video, and electronic communications and data and information by computer, cable, radio, radio paging, teleprinter, teleletter, electronic mail, facsimile machine, television, microwave, laser beam, communications satellite, microwave link, and terrestrial cable; Providing telecommunication connectivity services for transfer of voice, images, messages, audio, audiovisual and multimedia works; consultant services related to data communications; television and telecommunications transmission of information for business from a computer-stored data bank; electronic mail services; providing telecommunications connections to the Internet; providing multiple user access to the Internet; telecommunications gateway services; teletext services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hutchison Whampoa Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Hutchison Whampoa Enterprises Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named HUTCHISON 3G
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |