Drawing for ADAPTIR

USPTO serial 85697373

ADAPTIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REINHART, MEGHAN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ADAPTIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica Riva Talley

MONICA RIVA TALLEY STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.1100 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20005-6125UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042research and development in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fieldsACTIVEAug 19, 2014

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 6, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 28, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 28, 2016EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 28, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 28, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 15, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance