USPTO serial 85699501
SAFE FLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2013
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SAFE FLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
White Plains, NY
Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
WHITE PLAINS, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Clady
Susan E. Clady Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP127 Public SquareSuite 4900Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers for managing aircraft engine thrust; [ Computers with dual monitors for managing aircraft control devices; ] Avionic instruments for measuring angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Computers for warning of impending aircraft loss of lift and preventing loss of lift; Heater current monitor; Converters for translating aircraft angle of attack into different electrical formats; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for optimizing aircraft takeoff, climb and descent; Instruments for aligning aircraft angle-of-attack transducers, transmitters and sensors; [ Instruments used in aircraft automatic throttle systems including a processor for to prevent forces from the engine linkage from moving the throttles in the cockpit; ] Computers that warn of airflow downburst requiring corrective action; Automatic throttle control systems for aircraft; Electronic controllers for engaging and disengaging automatic throttle systems for aircraft; Autopower computer; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for automatically maintaining a particular airspeed or engine setting; Control and display screens used for automatic throttle system for aircraft; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for automatically maintaining a particular airspeed or engine setting; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for minimizing modification of throttle control assemblies in aircraft; Avionic sensor systems, namely, aircraft approach speed indicators; Avionic sensor systems, namely, aircraft speed control indicators; Avionic sensor systems, namely, instruments for indicating angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Avionic sensor systems, namely, instruments for sensing angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for indicating angle of attack of an aircraft in flight; Ice detector; Optical ice detector; [ Sensors for detecting aircraft flap deflection angle; ] Computers for controlling aircraft performance; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for monitoring helicopter engine and rotor system and warning of maximum ratings for the engine, transmission or rotor system; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for monitoring and warning of aircraft operation near live transmission lines; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for converting antenna impedance; [ Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for monitoring aircraft landing lights; ] Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for optimizing aircraft performance in takeoffs, climbs, approaches and upset recovery; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for preventing aircraft stall; Avionic sensor systems, namely, processors for providing warning of impending aircraft stall; Horn used in aircraft for providing warning of impending aircraft stall; Horn assemblies for installation in aircraft cockpit | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Safe Flight Instrument Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SAFE FLIGHT INSTRUMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SAFE FLIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 9, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 9, 2024 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 8, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2024 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2023 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 9, 2019 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 7, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |