USPTO serial 85699544
DOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest I. Gifford
MARK D SCHNEIDER GIFFORD KRASS SPRINKLE ANDERSON & CITKOWSKI PC2701 TROY CENTER DRSTE 330TROY, MI 48084-4741Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring laboratory supplies and equipment for biomedical and life sciences, not including diffractive optical devices for detecting biomolecules | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |