USPTO serial 85699676
OMOTENASHI HEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMOTENASHI HEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.1100 13TH ST NW FL W12WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4051UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus all for use in detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically, namely, computer servers for home energy management systems; computer software used in detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically, namely, software for managing, monitoring, analyzing, diagnosing, organizing, detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling of energy; domestic computer servers which performs in-home information control, security control, inference of users, information presentation to the users and information and communication to the users; temperature indicators; hygrometers; motion sensors; thermostats; smart electrical plugs and smart electrical outlets; sensors used for opening and shutting the door; electric and electronic machines and apparatus for electric power control, namely, electric instruments used for measuring the electricity according to the circuit of distribution board, and relay circuit controller to control On-Off of the illumination; remote control telemetering machines and instruments used for home energy management system; carbon monoxide analyzers; carbon dioxide analyzers; illuminometers; electricity meters; water dosage meters; gas meters; sensors used for opening and shutting the window | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Parts of heating installations, namely, control valves for heaters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of systems used for detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically, namely, consulting on the design of home energy management systems; providing information relating to online non-downloadable software for use in detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for use in detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically; designing, developing, and maintenance of systems used for detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically, namely, design and development of systems for detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically and maintenance of computer software used in detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically; computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software used in detecting, measuring, storing, transmitting and controlling energy automatically | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OMOTENASHI HEMS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |