Drawing for HAP

USPTO serial 85699826

HAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

DANIEL E. KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S.C.1000 N WATER ST STE 1800MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software to control linear reciprocating motion of a pump rod for use on subterranean pumps used in the oil and gas industriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 22, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 20, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
May 20, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 29, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Apr 29, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 11, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 5, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 28, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 18, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 10, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 13, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance