USPTO serial 85700016
MCX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MCX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Nieds
MARK A NIEDS IPHORGAN LTD195 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD SUITE #125BUFFALO GROVE, IL 60089-1768UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Marketing, advertising, and promoting the retail goods and services of others through wireless electronic devices; Promoting the sale of goods and services of others by distributing advertising material, coupons and discount offers via text messages, email, and the Internet; Promoting the goods and services of others, namely, providing coupons, rebates and vouchers for the goods of others via text messages, email, and the Internet; Promoting the goods of others, namely, providing information regarding discounts, coupons, rebates, vouchers and special offers for the goods of others via text messages, email, and the Internet; Promotional services, namely, promoting the goods of others by means of providing online coupons; Dissemination of advertising for others via public and private wireless networks for display on mobile devices; Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring coupons, rebates, price-comparison information, product reviews, links to the retail websites of others, and discount information; Online service for connecting social network users with retailers for the purpose of facilitating discounted purchases; Processing manufacturer's coupons; Providing incentive award programs for customers through the issuance and processing of loyalty coupons for frequent use of participating businesses; Advice and information about customer services and product management and prices on internet sites in connection with purchases made over the internet; Information, advisory, consulting, business research and planning services relating to publicity, marketing communications, reputation management or business administration, including such services provided online or via the internet; Business management consultancy in the field of purchases, namely, assisting businesses in improvement of purchasing functions; Consumer strategy business consulting in the fields of marketing, sales, operation, and product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic models for the understanding and predicting of consumer, business, and retail market trends and actions; Marketing and branding services, namely, performing consumer insight and brand strategy of company logos; Marketing services, namely, providing informational web pages designed to generate sales traffic via hyperlinks to other web sites | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Banking services provided by mobile telephone connections; Electronic banking via a global computer network; Credit union services provided by mobile telephone connections and via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCHANT CUSTOMER EXCHANGE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MERCHANT CUSTOMER EXCHANGE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Merchant Purchasing Network LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MCX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |