USPTO serial 85700451
AL BUSTAN FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4629150Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 2014
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AL BUSTAN FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dearborn Heights, MI, US
Dearborn Heights, MI, US
Dearborn Heights, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sam Fakih
Sam Fakih FAKIH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC16030 MICHIGAN AVE STE 200DEARBORN, MI 48126-2964United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Blended oil; Canned processed olives; Cooking oil; Dried figs; Edible oils; Olive oils; Processed olives; [ Processed stuffed olives; ] Tinned olives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 2014 |
| 030 | Flavourings and seasonings; Food seasonings; Molasses; Molasses syrup; Seasonings, namely, oregano, sumac, [ cumin, ] sesame, bay leaves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Majed, Mohamad Hassan
- Other trademarks owned by Majed, Mohamad Hassan
- Other trademarks owned by Majed, Mohamad Hassan
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named AL BUSTAN FOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2026 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2026 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | PUM2 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU2 | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Aug 5, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 10, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 18, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 16, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |