CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LEAD ON

USPTO serial 85700624

LEAD ON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAD ON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Kirsch

JONATHAN KIRSCH LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN KIRSCH1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 515LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, continuing audio-visual programs in the fields of aerobics, fitness, exercise, weight-loss, weight-maintenance, nutrition, health, wellness, fashion, lifestyle, music and relationships accessible by broadcast, cable, and satellite television and the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 11, 2015NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Mar 10, 2015DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 10, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 18, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 3, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 28, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 28, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 3, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 10, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance