USPTO serial 85700941
IMAGINEROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGINEROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. LaBrie
Michael J. LaBrie MCAFEE & TAFT211 N ROBINSON AVE10th Floor, Two Leadership Sq.OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-7176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery and equipment for use in automated materials handling and storage systems, namely, materials storage racking and shelving in the nature of warehouse racks and shelves, horizontal conveyors, vertical conveyors, accumulation conveyors, turntables, robotic transfer machines for moving materials between automated equipment and non-automated equipment, pushers in the nature of levers for diverting materials on conveyors, palletizers, de-palletizers, belt conveyors, sorting machines, diverters in the nature of levers for diverting materials on conveyors, automatic pallet and bin dispensing machines, industrial robots, automatically guided carriers in the nature of robotic carts, electric motors for machines, and electrical generators | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Machinery and equipment for use in automated materials handling and storage systems, namely, automated digital controls for commercial handling and storage systems; computer software for controlling automated materials handling and storage systems and computer hardware and computer peripherals for use in automated materials handling systems, namely, computer hardware, software, and peripherals for use in the guidance of transfer vehicles for use in the field of automated materials handling and computer hardware, software and peripherals for use in the control of automated materials picking; and electric and electronic instruments and apparatus for use in automated materials handling systems, namely, control cabinets specifically adapted for housing automated materials handling and storage equipment in the nature of controller hardware, software, and programmable logic controllers; Radio frequency controls, namely, RFID tags and readers; Infrared controls, namely, bar code scanners and infrared optical data couplers; Laser scanners, voice actuated controls for commercial handling and storage systems, sensors for sensing speed, location, dimensions and weight, electric switches for electric motors, electrical wires and cables, capacitors, power supplies, and emergency power supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Distribution services, namely, delivery of consumer goods and groceries; storage of consumer goods and groceries for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |