USPTO serial 85701171
Serial No. 85701171
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 85701171?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COQUITLAM, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA A. WRIGHT
SANDRA A. WRIGHT INFUSE WORKS INC.4280 Bayview Street#308RICHMOND, BC, V7E0B3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer application software for multipurpose mobile devices, namely, mobile phones, portable media players, tablet computers, and handheld computers which allows a user to create, store and share, video, text, images, and data content on social media networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Incentive award programs to promote the sale of products and services of others; Arranging and conducting incentive award programs to promote the sale of products and services of others, including the organization, operation and management or supervision of said incentive award programs; marketing services, namely, conducting consumer tracking behavior research and consumer trend analysis via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic messaging system, namely, electronic queuing services for use in the coordination of ongoing communications for automatic messaging; Telecommunication services, namely, providing e-mail notification alerts via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |