USPTO serial 85701470
MADSMART TIC TALK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADSMART TIC TALK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John K. Kim
JOHN K. KIM GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVE STE 104FLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-1092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Providing electronic journals and web logs, featuring user generated or specified content; Sponsoring and organizing online and live exhibitions and events in the field of software development; Gaming; Organization of competitions (education or entertainment); Education information; Recreation information; Arranging and conducting competitions for video gamers and computer game players; Electronic journals and Web logs, featuring user-generated or specified content; Photo-sharing and video sharing services; Photography services; Providing computer, electronic and online databases in the field of entertainment; Entertainment information; Providing online electronic publications, not downloadable; Electronic publication of books and journals online; Arranging of contests for recognizing, rewarding and encouraging individuals and groups for self-improvement, personal growth, charitable, philanthropic, volunteer activities, public and community service activities and humanitarian activities and for sharing of goods from creative activity (entertainment and education); Electronic desktop publishing; Electronic publishing services for third parties; Providing computer, electronic and online databases in the fields of secondary, collegiate, social and community interest groups; Providing information about online computer games and video games via computer or communication networks; Entertainment services, including facilitating interactive and multi-player and single player game services for games played via computer or communication networks; Game services provided online from a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |