USPTO serial 85702326
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elliot J. Groffman
ELLIOT J. GROFFMAN CARROLL, GUIDO & GROFFMAN, LLP9111 W SUNSET BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90069-3106UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | spinning tops; cases and accessories and objects for spinning tops and other toys; bath toys; fantasy character toys; action skill games; talking toys; bendable toys; wind-up toys; lever action toys; infant toys; push toys; pull toys; toy vehicle track sets and roadways and accessories and objects therefor; toy vehicles; attachable, wearable toy figurines; plush toys; mechanical toys; articles of clothing for toys; children's multiple activity toys; inflatable toys; card games; board games; game boards; arcade games; playsets for tops and other toys; educational toys for developing fine motor skills; toy buildings and vehicles; play mats, carrying bags and cases for toy buildings and toy vehicles; puzzles; spinning tops with lights; spinning LED lit tops; spinning tops with sounds; spinning tops with music; battery operated action toys and accessories therefor; electronic action toys and accessories therefor; fantasy character toys and accessories therefor; modeled plastic toy figurines and objects and accessories therefor; molded toy figures and objects and accessories therefor; tops with fabric; metal tops; wood tops; paper tops; and magnetic toys | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |