Drawing for UNLOCKING HUMAN PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 85703178

UNLOCKING HUMAN PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNLOCKING HUMAN PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

ANN K. FORD DLA PIPER LLP (US)500 8TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for use in analysis of athletic performance or sports, statistical analysis; downloadable software for the review, assessment, and evaluation of football player performance; downloadable software for predicting player performance; downloadable software for use by players and coaches for analysis of athletic performance related to football, baseball, basketball, hockey, soccer, and other sports and athletic competitions; downloadable electronic publications, namely, newsletters, magazines, player rosters, and articles related to sports and athletic competitionsACTIVE—
035Providing sports statistical analysis services containing football player performance reviews, assessments, and evaluations for business purposesACTIVE—
041providing a website featuring information related to sports news and analysisACTIVE—
042providing non-downloadable online software for use in analysis of athletic performance or sports, statistical analysis; providing non-downloadable online software for the review, assessment, and evaluation of football player performance; providing non-downloadable online software for predicting player performance; providing non-downloadable online software for use by players and coaches for analysis of athletic performance related to football, baseball, basketball, hockey, soccer, and other sports and athletic competitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 2, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 7, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 24, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance