USPTO serial 85703444
CONVENTION COMMUNICATION PROVISIONERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4499653Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 18, 2014
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONVENTION COMMUNICATION PROVISIONERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SMART CITY NETWORKS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
LAS VEGAS, NV
Other trademarks owned by SMART CITY NETWORKS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Lake Buena Vista, FL
Lake Buena Vista, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward F. Maluf
Edward F. Maluf Seyfarth Shaw LLP620 8th Ave32nd FloorNew York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Electrical contractor services for telecommunications systems at remote locations, namely, installing hardware for telecommunications systems at tradeshows; installation and maintenance of digital signage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2006 |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing user access to high-speed communications networks to conference and convention centers, convention facilities, and general purpose facilities to remote locations for the trandmission of voice, data and information; and providing telecommunication connectivity services for the transmission of audio and visual works; providing technical support services regarding the usage of telecommunications equipment; telecommunications services, namely, providing high-speed Internet access via wired and wireless networks; telecommunications services, namely, providing local and long distance telephone services; telecommunications services, namely, the local and long distance transmission of voice, data, video, facsimile and information by means of telephone, cable, satellite, wireless and Internet protocol data transmission; wireless broadband communications services for businesses, residential and trade show consumers; providing multiple user access to a global communications network; electronic mail services; voice over IP services; rental and leasing of telecommunications equipment, components, systems and supplies; webcasting of live events from convention centers, hotels and stadiums; facsimile and Internet access, namely, providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the Internet; wireless data services, namely, wireless electronic transmission of voice signals, data, facsimile images and information; telecommunications consulting services in the fields of voice and data via telecommunications networks; providing co-location services, for voice, video and data communications applications; telecommunications services, namely, providing high speed access and wireless access to a global computer information network; providing high-speed telecommunications connections to global networks; cable television broadcasting services; webcasting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2006 |
| 042 | [ Web hosting services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer co-location services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of others; consulting in the field of communications technology ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART CITY NETWORKS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by Smart City Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Smart City Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONVENTION COMMUNICATION PROVISIONERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 18, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |