USPTO serial 85703474
KNO EVOLVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KNO EVOLVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne H. Peck
ANNE H. PECK COOLEY LLP777 6TH ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for delivery, display, storage and manipulation of data, text, images, audio, and video; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for delivery, display, storage and manipulation of data, text, images, audio, and video | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2013 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |