USPTO serial 85704470
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Salt Lake City, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester K. Essig
LESTER K ESSIG RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER PC36 S STATE STSTE 1400SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1451| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Dressers, armoires, furniture chests, chests of drawers, cabinets, hutches, beds, cribs, convertible cribs, tables, end tables, baby changing tables, shelves, furniture shelves, bookshelves, book cases, and furniture parts, all as sold solely through distribution channels and outlets not offering electrical lighting fixtures and lamps | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |