USPTO serial 85704561
COOKLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NASSERGHODSI, SAHAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COOKLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mont-Royal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Smilie
SCOTT W. SMILIE PATZIK, FRANK & SAMOTNY LTD.150 S WACKER DR STE 1500CHICAGO, IL 60606-4201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cookware, namely, pots, pans, roasting pans, cooking steamers, skillets, non-electric griddles, woks; Cooking utensils, namely, grills, grill covers, cooking graters, wire baskets, sieves, spatulas, strainers, turners, rolling pins, whisks, skimmers, kitchen tongs, splatter screens, kitchen ladles, basting spoons, and knife blocks; Kitchen tools and accessories, namely, cookie jars, carafes, chopping boards for kitchen use, garlic presses, napkin holders not of metal, coaster sets not of paper and not being table linen, salad bowl sets, salad spinners, gravy boats, salt and pepper mills, spice racks and ice cream scoops | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring cookware, bakeware, cooking utensils, kitchen tools and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |