Drawing for MACOM M

USPTO serial 85705730

MACOM M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MACOM M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-4011

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Horizontal and vertical stainless steel refrigerators and freezers; refrigerated display cases and heated and refrigerated pass thru, namely, a refrigerated cabinet accessible on both sides by doors to hold and store food; electric and gas fryers; gas and induction stoves; gas and electric griddles; gas char broiler; electric and gas powered Bain-marie food warmer, namely, a warm water bath with built in wells to insert pots to heat gently and keep food warm; gas and electric pasta cookers; gas and electric overhead fryers; gas powered cauldrons; steel sinksACTIVE—
020Steel furniture, namely, cupboards, shelves, tables with and without bottom shelves, display cases, buffets, shelving units with incorporated sinksACTIVE—
021Cauldrons for use on gas stoves; Bain-marie food warmer sets, namely, pots and a warm water bath with build in wells to insert pots to heat gently and keep food warm for use on gas and electric stovesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 27, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 14, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 14, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance