USPTO serial 85706539
LAND ROVER ABOVE AND BEYOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAND ROVER ABOVE AND BEYOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna K. Heinl
JENNIFER K ZIEGLER BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Land vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land, namely, automobiles and trucks; land vehicle axles; motor vehicle bodies; brake calipers, braking systems, structural parts for automobiles in the nature of draw bars, structural parts for automobiles in the nature of bumper bars, clutches, differential gears, drive gears, drive shafts, engines and motors, fans for engines, speed change gears, transmissions, transmission drive shafts, exhausts, hydraulic brake cylinders and motors for automobiles, shaft couplings, and carrying wheel bearings, all of the foregoing for land vehicles; chassis for motor vehicles; non-automatic manual and power steering units, personal safety vehicle seat restraints, seats, sliding roof panels, steering units in the nature of columns, all of the foregoing for land vehicles; vehicle wheel hubs; vehicle wheels; land vehicle structural parts in the nature of bug shield deflectors, direction signals, doors, land vehicle structural parts in the nature of hatches, upholstery, handles for doors, horns, retrovisors in the nature of rearview mirrors, mud-flaps, roof-racks, luggage carriers and nets, bicycle carriers, sail board carriers, ski carriers, tire snow chains, shock absorbers, suspension springs, stabiliser torsion bars, steering wheels, steering linkages, suspension struts, torsion bars, tow bars, windows, land vehicle structural parts in the nature of window winding mechanisms, windscreen wipers, all of the foregoing for land vehicles; arm rests for motor vehicle seats; balance weights for vehicle wheels; spare vehicle wheels; shaped covers for steering wheels; brake pads and brake linings, all for land vehicles; cabs for trucks and for tractors; caps for vehicle fuel tanks; mechanical controls for clutches in the nature of clutch mechanisms for motor cars, mechanical controls for transmissions in the nature of transmission mechanisms for land vehicles, mountings for engines, all of the foregoing for land motor vehicles; gas tanks, land vehicle structural parts in the nature of engine noise shields, side mirror protective covers, auto aftermarket accessories in the nature of vehicle custom grills for placement in front of radiators, land vehicle structural parts in the nature of stowage boxes and stowage compartments, spare wheel carriers, all being parts of land vehicles; land vehicle structural parts in the nature of tilt mechanisms for vehicle cabs; trim panels for vehicle bodies; pumps for inflating vehicle tires; sun blinds adapted for automobiles; motor land vehicles; military land motor vehicles; police land motor vehicles; trailers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |