USPTO serial 85706781
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence Corrales
607 C AVELAWTON, OK 73501UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing BROADCAST PROGRAMS featuring NEWS, MUSIC, COMEDY, COMMENTARY, ON AIR AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION VIA TELEPHONE, CHATROOM, TEXT, EMAIL, delivered by INTERNET, RADIO, SATELLITE, TELEVISION, OTHER VIDEO AND AUDIO MEDIUM | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2014 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2013 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |