Drawing for CERTIFIED LOCALLY OWNED

USPTO serial 85706939

CERTIFIED LOCALLY OWNED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTIFIED LOCALLY OWNED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

JAY BEGLER NISEAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREETNINTH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Accreditation services, namely, setting and providing standards for local and independently owned businesses for the purpose of accreditationACTIVEAug 15, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 9, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 9, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 8, 2013RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 8, 2013RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2013RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 2, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 2, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance