USPTO serial 85707523
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer E. Horn
JENNIFER E. HORN MANSOUR GAVIN LPA1001 LAKESIDE AVENUESUITE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Designing and engineering of custom air handling systems for commercial, industrial and institutional use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 8, 2017 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 18, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNR1 | NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | GNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2013 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |