Drawing for Serial No. 85708119

USPTO serial 85708119

Serial No. 85708119

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85708119?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Lee Taylor

JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric fans; electric freestanding fans; electric fans for personal use; air cooling apparatusACTIVEJan 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 31, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 31, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 11, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 8, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 2014RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Aug 4, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 18, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 15, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 15, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 24, 2013UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2013EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jul 15, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 15, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2012DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance