USPTO serial 85708184
AMURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
ROBERT E BUSHNELL ROBERT E BUSHNELL & LAW FIRM2029 K STREET NW SUITE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE FUND RAISING, FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF DISASTER RELIEF TO OTHERS AND FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF EMERGENCY FOOD; SHELTER, MEDICAL AND SANITATION ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES; FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION FOR PROVISION OF EMERGENCY FOOD, SHELTER, MEDICAL AND SANITATION ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES; FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, ADVICE AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONETARY CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS; FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, ADVICE AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONETARY GRANTS FOR CHARITABLE PROJECTS, FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, ADVICE AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MONETARY GRANTS FOR CHARITABLE PROJECTS; FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION, ADVICE AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR IN KIND GRANTS FOR CHARITABLE PROJECTS; FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF EMERGENCY FOOD, SHELTER, MEDICAL, AND SANITATION ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS, AND FAMILIES, ADVICE AND CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL, COMPUTER NETWORK, PROVIDING FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION ABOUT CHARITABLE FUND RAISING; PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT DISASTER RELIEF TO OTHERS; PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT EMERGENCY FOOD, SHELTER, MEDICAL AND SANITATION ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES; PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT ACCEPTANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF MONETARY CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS; PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT ACCEPTANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF GRANTS FOR CHARITABLE PROJECTS; PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATIVE CHARITABLE SERVICES; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT ACCEPTANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF IN-KIND GRANTS FOR CHARITABLE PROJECTS; PROVIDING ON-LINE FINANCIAL NEWS, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE FINANCIAL NEWS ABOUT FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE SERVICES AND PROJECT FINANCING; PROVIDING ON-LINE NEWS ABOUT FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF CHARITABLE OF EMERGENCY FOOD, SHELTER, MEDICAL AND SANITATION ASSISTANCE FOR INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |