CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OPTIFORM

USPTO serial 85712242

OPTIFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPTIFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE H. SALES

BRUCE H. SALES Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP600 South Avenue WestWestfield, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020pillows and fiber bedsACTIVE—
024mattress padsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 6, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 7, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 10, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 1, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 25, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 14, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance