Drawing for STRETCHKNIT

USPTO serial 85712273

STRETCHKNIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRETCHKNIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark A. Puntigam

CLARK A PUNTIGAM JENSEN & PUNTIGAM PS2033 6TH AVESTE 1020SEATTLE, WA 98121-2527

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024mattress padsACTIVEAug 1, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 5, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 31, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 7, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 4, 2014AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2014IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 3, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 25, 2014AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 25, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 24, 2014EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 24, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 25, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 25, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 5, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance