USPTO serial 85713853
HALO POCKET POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, SUSAN EILEEN BI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HALO POCKET POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glastonbury, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wm. Tucker Griffith
WM TUCKER GRIFFITH MCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STCITYPLACE IIHARTFORD, CT 06103-3410Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Battery chargers and rechargers, and power supply connector cables with connection interfaces, sold together as a unit for use for connection to portable electronic devices, namely, computers, cell phones, smart phones, tablets, handheld gaming devices, and global positioning satellite (GPS) devices, the aforementioned specifically excluding electronic connectors and adapters for use with local area networks (LAN) or wide area networks (WAN), modules, transformers, filters, and any magnetic coupling components that may be used in communications products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |