USPTO serial 85713956
ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4599013Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2014
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORGANIZATIONAL EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita C. Chipperson
Rita C. Chipperson CHIPPERSON LAW GROUP PC25 GREEN VILLAGE RD SUITE 2AMADISON, NJ 07940-2582UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Business training in the field of leadership development and executive coaching; continuing business education courses provided to employees and executives; providing group coaching and learning forums in the field of leadership development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2021 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |