USPTO serial 85714129
MADD GEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADD GEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Stabe, Esquire
SUSAN STABE, ESQUIRE TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ STE 5200600 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Entertainment computer programs, namely, video, electronic and computer game software; computer game software; computer game programs; downloadable, electronically delivered game software; game programmes and software for use with electronic games of all kinds; interactive multimedia games software | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Non-motorised vehicles, namely, bicycles, tricycles, scooters, carts, two-wheeled cycle with handbrakes which is pushed not pedalled, scooters, and structural parts and accessories thereof, namely, wheels, tyres, brakes, scooter decks, handlebars, grips, grip tape, pedals, spokes, rims, seats, forks, bars, clamps, bearings, headsets which provide a rotatable interface between the bicycle, tricycle, cycle or scooter fork and the bicycle, tricycle, cycle or scooter frame, pegs, pedals and cranks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, hooded sweatshirts and singlets; footwear; headgear, namely, beanies, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, balls, toy scooters, toy bicycles other than for transport, toy tricycles other than for transport, toy carts other than for transport, and structural parts and accessories thereof, namely, wheels, tyres, brakes, scooter decks, handlebars, grips, grip tape, pedals, spokes, rims, seats, forks, bars, clamps, bearings, headsets, pegs, pedals and cranks all for toy bicycles and toy scooters other than for transport; gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, snowboards, skates, skateboards, in-line skates, roller skates, and structural parts and accessories thereof, namely, wheels, board wax and brakes; home video game machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, energy drinks, energy shots, carbonated beverages, flavoured waters, spring water, still water; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making non-alcoholic beverages, namely, sports and energy drinks, cordials and fruit flavoured beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Madd Gear Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MADD GEAR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |