USPTO serial 85714732
BENTLEY & ROYCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BENTLEY & ROYCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Scott Beebe
DANIEL SCOTT BEEBE DSB LEGAL CONSULTING12 CHAPALA CTFOOTHILL RANCH, CA 92610-3435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency services; Internet and wireless media advertising and marketing services; media planning, namely, advising the client on correct times and stations to advertise based on media analysis of the market for the media; placement of advertisements for others; business marketing services, namely, public relations and social media advertising; social media strategy and marketing consultancy focusing on helping clients create brand identity systems and extend their product and brand strategies by providing client-specific marketing solutions; promoting the goods and services of others through search engine referral traffic analysis and reporting; marketing consulting, namely, design and development of marketing and promotional campaign(s) for others | ABANDONED | Aug 21, 2012 |
| 042 | Provide graphic and multimedia design services for the purpose of promoting the goods and services of others, namely, designing and creating websites for others; graphic design services for creating graphic elements of corporate logos; packaging design; trade show display design; computer services, namely, search engine optimization | ABANDONED | Aug 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |