USPTO serial 85715602
CO2NCRETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CO2NCRETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Halifax, Nova Scotia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla J. Vrsansky
CARLA J. VRSANSKY BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC301 GRANT ST FL 20PITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1410UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | concrete products, namely, concrete, precast concrete, concrete blocks and concrete masonry units, namely: for use in concrete agricultural products, namely, bunker silos, cattle feed bunks, cattle guards, agricultural fencing, H-bunks, J-bunks, livestock slats, and livestock watering troughs; concrete products, namely precast concrete building components and site amenities for use for cladding, trim products and accessories; for use in structural applications namely foundations, beams, floors, walls; for use in cemetery vaults and mausoleums; for use in storing hazardous materials; for use for marine products namely floating docks, underwater infrastructure, decking, railings and waterfront amenities; for modular paving for residential, commercial and public use; prestressed and structural concrete products, namely concrete beams, spandrels, columns, single and double tees, wall panels, segmental bridge units, bulb-tee girders, I-beam girders; concrete earth retaining walls; for use in building sanitary and storm water retention products; for use in the construction, safety and site protection of road, airport and railroad transportation systems, culverts, bridge systems, railroad crossings, railroad ties, short-span bridges, sound walls and barriers, traffic barriers and tunnel segments; for use in utility structures, namely, for communications, electrical, gas or steam systems, such as hand holes, hollowcore products, light pole bases, meter boxes, panel vaults, pull boxes, telecommunications structures, transformer pads, transformer vaults, trenches, utility buildings, utility vaults, utility poles, controlled environment vaults (CEVs) and other utility structures; for use for precast water and wastewater aeration systems, distribution boxes, dosing tanks, dry wells, grease interceptors, leaching pits, sand-oil/oil-water interceptors, septic tanks, water/sewage storage tanks, wetwells, fire cisterns and other water and wastewater products; concrete and concrete building products namely blocks, slabs, pipe, brick, stones, retaining wall units and wall panels, tiles for roofs and flooring, benches, countertops for further installation, steps | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | designing equipment for others relating to concrete production, parts, ingredients and methods of manufacture; consulting in the field of design for equipment and related parts used in concrete production and manufacture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |