Drawing for ROLITH

USPTO serial 85716580

ROLITH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLITH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julian L. Zegelman

5880 W LAS POSITAS BLVD STE 51PLEASANTON, CA 94588-8552UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Coatings made by optical lithography for exterior and interior use on a variety of substrates, namely, anti-reflective coatings, anti-fogging coatings, anti-scratch coatings, and anti-smudge coatings for glass, plastic, and metalACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 12, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 26, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 26, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 26, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Sep 1, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance