Drawing for IDNA

USPTO serial 85716882

IDNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IDNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tanya L. Curtis

TANYA L. CURTIS KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP525 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60661-3629UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045AN ONLINE, INTERACTIVE DATABASE COMPRISED OF AN INDIVIDUAL'S PERSONAL PREFERENCES, GOALS, BELIEFS, HOBBIES, INTERESTS AND FRIENDS USED FOR INTERNET OR MOBILE BASED INTRODUCTION AND SOCIAL NETWORKING TO BE USED IN VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES; PROVIDING AN ONLINE, INTERACTIVE DATABASE THAT CONTAINS PERSONAL PROFILES AND INFORMATION DISTRIBUTED TO PARTICIPANTS ENGAGED IN DISCUSSIONS AND FEEDBACK VIA SOCIAL NETWORKING AND THEN TAILORING THE INFORMATION TO MEET EACH INDIVIDUAL'S PERSONAL PREFERENCES AND PROFILEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 2, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 1, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance