CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MAZOR ROBOTICS INSPIRING THE ART OF SURGERY

USPTO serial 85717246

MAZOR ROBOTICS INSPIRING THE ART OF SURGERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4382709Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 13, 2013
Examiner
SPARER, ZACHARY R
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MAZOR ROBOTICS INSPIRING THE ART OF SURGERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Albrecht

John W. Albrecht Medtronic plc60 Middletown AvenueNorth Haven, CT 06473UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010ROBOTIC GUIDANCE SYSTEMS FOR SURGICAL USE COMPRISING SURGICAL GUIDANCE ROBOTS, ROBOTIC ARMS, WORKSTATIONS, OPERATING AND IMAGING SOFTWARE, MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSORS AND MOUNTING PLATFORMS; COMPLEMENTARY PRODUCTS FOR USE WITH SURGICAL ROBOTIC GUIDANCE SYSTEMS FOR SURGICAL USE TO CREATE A SAFE SURGICAL ENVIRONMENT FOR PATIENTS, SURGEONS, AND STAFF, NAMELY, ROBOTIC CLAMPS, ARTIFICIAL SPINE IMPLANTS AND PEDICLE SCREWSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 28, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2020C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 12, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2018REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 4, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 27, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 27, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance