Drawing for GOLDEN ISLAND

USPTO serial 85717470

GOLDEN ISLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLDEN ISLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Lynn Bedell

Mary Lynn Bedell The Hillshire Brands Company400 S. Jefferson StreetChicago, IL 60607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Gourmet meat snacks; meat-based snack foods; packaged meats; dried meats; jerky; beef jerky and pork jerkyACTIVE—
035Wholesale and retail store services featuring gourmet snacks, meat-based snack foods, packaged meats, dried meats, jerky, beef jerky and pork jerky; online retail store services featuring gourmet snacks, meat-based snack foods, packaged meats, dried meats, jerky, beef jerky and pork jerkyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2014FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 21, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 21, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 22, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance