Drawing for INTELLIGENT PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 85719228

INTELLIGENT PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jana L. France

JANA L. FRANCE FSB FISHERBROYLES LLP4505 JEWEL LN NPLYMOUTH, MN 55446UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles and their structural partsACTIVE—
037Maintenance and repair of automobiles and automotive equipment; automobile customization services, namely, turning standard cars into sport and racing carsACTIVE—
041Sports and cultural activities, namely, arranging and conducting of sports and cultural events in the nature of racing competitions, automobile rallies, tournaments, festivals, exhibitions and competitions, arranging and conducting of race sport events, entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by sports celebrities performing and competing in motor sport eventsACTIVE—
042Technology research for others in the field of vehicle and engine manufacturing; technological consultation services in the field of vehicle and engine manufacturing; industrial research services in the field of vehicle and engine manufacturing design; design and development of vehicles and parts thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 9, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 1, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance