Drawing for SUN SOUL ORCHESTRA

USPTO serial 85719385

SUN SOUL ORCHESTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN SOUL ORCHESTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana B. Robinson

DANA B ROBINSON TECHLAW LLPPO BOX 1416LA JOLLA, CA 92038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audiovisual recordings featuring musical performances by a musical group; phonorecords featuring music by a musical group; downloaded audio and video recordings of the music of a musical group; downloadable ring tones and graphics of a musical group; Video magazine recorded on electronic media featuring music by a musical groupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 14, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 14, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 5, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 18, 2013DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 17, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 22, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 20, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance