Drawing for SNOOP JUICE

USPTO serial 85722229

SNOOP JUICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNOOP JUICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices and vegetable juices, fruit beverages, fruit flavored beverages, fruit-based beverages, vegetable juice beverages, vegetable flavored juice beverages, vegetable-based juice beverages, fruit and vegetable juice beverages, soda water flavored with fruit, soda water flavored with vegetables, soda water flavored with fruits and vegetables, soda pop, fruit juice, vegetable juice, fruit and vegetable juice, fruit drinks, vegetable drinks, fruit and vegetable juice drinks, mixed fruit juice, mixed vegetable juice, mixed fruit and vegetable juicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 18, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 15, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 11, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 1, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 4, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 12, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 12, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 20, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance