Drawing for USER'S CHOICE AWARDS

USPTO serial 85723416

USER'S CHOICE AWARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USER'S CHOICE AWARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ginabeth B. Hutchison

GINABETH B. HUTCHISON ALSTON & BIRD LLP1201 W PEACHTREE ST NW STE 4000ATLANTA, GA 30309-3424UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards to demonstrate the accessibility of others' goods and/or services to individuals with arthritisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance