Drawing for CRAVATIONS

USPTO serial 85724460

CRAVATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAVATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael L. Mau

Michael L. Mau Dicke, Billig & Czaja, PLLC100 South Fifth Street, Suite 2250Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Food items, namely, combinations of apples and caramel, namely, combination of food primarily consisting of processed apples and also containing caramel; salmon dip and crackers, namely, combination of food primarily consisting of salmon dip and also containing crackers; mesquite chicken salad and crackers, namely, combination of food primarily consisting of mesquite chicken salad and also containing crackers; mesquite chicken salad and celery sticks in the nature of processed vegetables; buffalo chicken salad and crackers, namely, combination of food primarily consisting of buffalo chicken salad and also containing crackers; and the combination of meat sticks in the nature of processed meat and barbeque sauce, namely, combination of food primarily consisting of meat sticks in the nature of processed meat and also containing barbeque sauceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 29, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 9, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 11, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 1, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 2, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance