Drawing for ENCOMPASS

USPTO serial 85728247

ENCOMPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENCOMPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles L. Gagnebin III

CHARLES L. GAGNEBIN III Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios LLP60 State StreetSuite 1100Boston, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Proprietary software for implementation of structured content (XML) publishing systems for managing English language content and translations of the contentACTIVE—
035Providing translation project management support through proprietary productivity softwareACTIVE—
041Providing online translation services, namely, language translation of medical device labeling; translation including providing localization for appropriate country-specific modification of medical device software for user interface and documentation; translation including localization of medical device marketing content; translation including localization for medical device e-learning courses; the aforementioned localization services involving the re-writing and re-formatting of documents, applications and websites so as to be understood and accepted by local users; translation of clinical trial documentation; providing linguistic translation services via in person conference or over-the-phone in support of operations for medical device manufacturersACTIVE—
042Providing technical consulting services in the field of machine translation technology usageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 27, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 14, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 19, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2013NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance