USPTO serial 85728534
HUMANX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMANX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fairfield, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward S. Wright
EDWARD S WRIGHT LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD S WRIGHT1100 ALMA STSUITE 207MENLO PARK, CA 94025-3344Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Exercise and fitness equipment, namely, weightlifting gloves, balance trainers, jump ropes, wrist stabilizers and supports, fabric wrist wraps, weight vests, forearm protectors, resistance cables, push-up bars, foam rollers, personal exercise mats, personal exercise mats for abdominal exercise, yoga mat towels, palm flap gloves, weightlifting straps, knee wraps, weightlifting belts, weightlifting head harnesses, abdominal weightlifting straps, weightlifting hooks, and weightlifting bar pads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2016 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |