USPTO serial 85729008
VIRTUAL REFERENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL REFERENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVE FL 23BOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | administration, management and implementation of employee incentive award programs for others to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; administration, management and implementation of sales incentive programs to promote the sale of goods and services of others; administration, management and implementation of employee recognition programs for the purpose of promoting employee engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; consulting services in connection with creating and managing incentive programs for third party businesses to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale of their employees; managing online incentive award and recognition programs for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, hosting and managing an online website that enables third party companies to administer and manage employee award and recognition programs to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; providing online, non-downloadable software for administration, management, and implementation of employee incentive award and recognition programs to promote on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale; providing online, non-downloadable software for administration, management, and implementation of sales incentive programs to promote the sale of products and services of others; providing online, non-downloadable software for administration, management, and implementation of employee recognition programs for the purpose of promoting on the job engagement, performance, productivity, recognition, and morale | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |