USPTO serial 85729012
YOU CANNOT MANAGE WHAT YOU CANNOT MEASURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOU CANNOT MANAGE WHAT YOU CANNOT MEASURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Mayback & Hoffman, P.A.5846 S. Flamingo Rd. #232Fort Lauderdale, FL 33330UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Inspection, assessment, monitoring and quality management of water, wastewater and oil and gas pipelines; Project management services in the field of water, wastewater and oil and gas pipeline engineering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |